InstructionsYou are a president of a healthcare quality improvement association in your region. Because of your astute leadership and experience leading changes requiring quality improvement efforts, you have been invited to contribute to the quarterly magazine on the application of quality improvement processes and approaches and on the contribution of thought leaders.With this request in mind, develop a succinct article that addresses the following:At least three thought leaders in this field and their contributions.At least three quality improvement processes and approaches such as:Shewhart CycleSix SigmaAPI Improvement ModelLean/Toyota Production SystemFOCUS PDCA ModelLength: 2-3 pagesReferences: Include a minimum of 3-5 peer-reviewed, scholarly resources at the end of your articleYour assignment should reflect scholarly academic writing, current APA standards, and adhere to University’s Academic Integrity Policy.Upload your document and click the Submit to Dropbox button.Due DateNov 19, 2017 11:59 PMHide RubricsRubric Name: Common Grading Rubric – 5 PointsCriteriaNot EvidentNeeds ImprovementMeetsExceedsContent per Assignment Instructions 30% of total0 pointsCompleted few parts of the assignment and/or did not address many questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.1.125 pointsCompleted some parts of the assignment and/or did not address several questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.1.275 pointsCompleted all required parts of the assignment and addressed most of the questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.1.5 pointsCompleted all required parts of the assignment and addressed all questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.Critical Thinking 50% of total0 pointsNo evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. No evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were generally not thoughtful, thorough, or well-reasoned.1.875 pointsLittle evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. Little evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were occasionally thoughtful and/or may not have been thorough or well-reasoned2.125 pointsSome evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. Some evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were mostly thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned.2.5 pointsStrong evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. Detailed evidence of analysis of assignment concept. Responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasonedIntegration of Resources 10% of total0 pointsResources are not scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of poor quality and/or not appropriate for the assignment.0.375 pointsSome resources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of good quality and/or appropriate for the assignment.0.425 pointsMost resources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of good quality and/or appropriate for the assignment.0.5 pointsResources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed and were of excellent quality and/or appropriate for the assignment.Grammar/ Mechanics/APA Formatting 10% of total0 pointsNumerous misspelled words and grammatical errors. APA formatting not used.0.375 pointsFrequently misspells words and/or makes consistent grammatical errors. Numerous APA formatting issues.0.425 pointsOccasionally misspells words and/or some grammatical errors. Minor APA formatting issues.0.5 pointsNo or very few misspelled words and/or no or very few grammatical errors. No APA formatting issuesOverall ScoreLevel 10 or moreLevel 23.3 or moreLevel 34.2 or moreLevel 44.5 or more

Are you having trouble with the above assignment or one similar?

To date, 239 students have ordered this same assignment from us and received 100% original work. We can do the same for you!

We offers 100% original papers that are written from scratch.We also have a team of editors who check each paper for plagiarism before it is sent to you.

Click this “order now” button to see free Cost Breakdown!