M4 A7 DB: OUTCOMES OF PATIENT EMPOWERMENT READINGS: Burkhardt & Nathaniel (2013): Ch 18, 19, 20; Journal Articles: Paget et al (2011) & Gluyas (2015). – attached For this discussion, you will answer the following questions: What factors should be considered when dealing with decisions where the nurse and patient hold differing values?Give one example of a situation where patient empowerment might pose an ethical dilemma for you.If you feel a patient is making an unwise decision, how would you respond?Should there be limits on patient empowerment? Minimum of two (2) references, in addition to examples from your personal experiences to augment the topic. The goal is to make your post interesting and engaging so others will want to read/respond to it. Synthesize and summarize from your resources in order to avoid the use of direct quotes, which can often be dry and boring. No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts. Due Dates: Friday, November 29, 2019 by 7:30 am References: Initial Post: Minimum of two (2) total references: one (1) from required course materials and one (1) from peer-reviewed references. Words Limits Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)
nrse_4510_m4_im_article_communication_patient_safety.pdf
nrse_4510_m4_im_article_patient_clinician_communication_basic_principles_and_applications.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
CPD
CONTINUING
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
Effective communication and
teamwork promotes patient safety
NS805 Gluyas H (2015) Effective communication and teamwork promotes patient safety. Nursing Standard.
29, 49, 50-57. Date of submission: March 15 2015; date of acceptance: May 14 2015.
Abstract
Aims and intended learning outcomes
Teamwork requires co-operation, co-ordination and communication
between members of a team to achieve desired outcomes. In industries
with a high degree of risk, such as health care, effective teamwork
has been shown to achieve team goals successfully and efficiently,
with fewer errors. This article introduces behaviours that support
communication, co-operation and co-ordination in teams. The central
role of communication in enabling co-operation and co-ordination is
explored. A human factors perspective is used to examine tools to improve
communication and identify barriers to effective team communication in
health care.
This article aims to inform the reader about
effective teamwork and communication. The
behaviours required for effective teamwork,
the key elements of effective communication
and common tools that support successful
communication within a team are discussed.
After reading this article and completing the
time out activities you should be able to:
Explain the pivotal role of effective
teamwork in promoting patient safety and
quality care.
Describe the behaviours that are required for
effective teamwork.
List the barriers to effective communication
in health care.
Describe common tools that can be used to
improve team communication.
Relate effective communication to your own
practice.
Develop your communication skills in your
team environment.
Author
Heather Gluyas Associate professor, School of Health Professions,
Murdoch University, Mandurah, Western Australia.
Correspondence to: heather.gluyas@gmail.com
Keywords
Communication, co-operation, human factors, patient safety,
revalidation, structured communication tools, team briefing, teamwork
Review
All articles are subject to external double-blind peer review and checked
for plagiarism using automated software.
Revalidation
Prepare for revalidation: read this CPD article, answer the questionnaire
and write a reflective account. Go to www.rcni.com/revalidation
Online
For related articles visit the archive and search using the keywords above.
To write a CPD article: please email gwen.clarke@rcni.com
Guidelines on writing for publication are available at:
journals.rcni.com/r/author-guidelines
Introduction
Teamwork involves a group of people working
together to achieve a common purpose (St Pierre
et al 2011). Teamwork requires co-operation,
co-ordination and communication between
members of a team to achieve desired
outcomes. In industries where there is high risk,
such as health care, effective teamwork has
been shown to achieve team goals successfully
and efficiently, with fewer errors. Conversely,
poor teamwork has been shown to result in
errors and suboptimal outcomes (Walker 2008,
Donohue and Endacott 2010, Lee et al 2012,
Lyons and Popejoy 2014).
This article introduces behaviours that
support communication, co-operation and
co-ordination in teams, and explores the
central role of communication in enabling
50 august
5 :: vol
29RCNi.com
no 49 :: 2015
STANDARD
Downloaded
from
by ${individualUser.displayName} on Jun 01, 2017. For personal use only. NoNURSING
other uses without
permission.
Copyright © 2017 RCN Publishing Company Ltd
co-operation and co-ordination. A human
factors perspective is used to identify barriers
to effective team communication in health
care and to examine tools that improve
communication.
Complete time out activity 1
In health care, teamwork is integral to
providing safe and effective care to patients. The
importance of effective teamwork in response
to the growing complexity of care involving
chronic conditions and associated comorbidities
is increasingly recognised (St Pierre et al 2011).
Most patient encounters involve more than one
healthcare professional and may involve many
people, depending on the type of healthcare
problem. These individuals may include doctors,
nurses, allied health professionals and other
specialist professionals. Teams from different
healthcare sectors, such as primary care, acute
care, mental health or chronic care, may also
be involved. Effective communication – both
verbal and written – between team members and
between different teams is essential to ensure
co-operation and co-ordination of care.
Ineffective communication, which leads to
poor co-operation and co-ordination of care,
is a major cause of errors and adverse events in
patient care (World Health Organization
2009). Communication errors occurring
at handover, either between team members
or between different teams, may lead to
inaccurate diagnosis, incorrect treatment
and/or medication errors (Wong et al 2008).
Poor communication in teams leads to team
members having different perceptions of
situations and of what is required to manage
them (Brady and Goldenhar 2014). Such
differing perceptions of a situation among
team members may be viewed as the lack of a
shared mental model, and this has been shown
to contribute to serious safety events (Gluyas
and Morrison 2013, Brady and Goldenhar
2014). Moreover, a lack of effective team
communication has been shown to contribute
to delayed response to deteriorating patients
(Endacott et al 2007). Patient safety in
surgical interventions may be compromised
if there is poor team communication (Lyons
and Popejoy 2014). This may result in
serious adverse events such as wrong patient,
procedure and/or site; retained instruments;
infections; and unanticipated blood loss
(Treadwell et al 2014).
Thomas et al (2013) examined data from
459 patient safety incidents relating to clinical
handover in acute care settings. They found
that 28.8% of incidents (n=132) involved
transfer of patients without adequate handover,
19.2% of incidents (n=88) involved omissions
of critical information about the patients’
condition and 14.2% of incidents (n=65)
involved omission of critical information in
patients’ care plans.
Poor communication is not limited to
incidents in the acute sector. It may also be a
factor in poor outcomes when transferring
care between sectors, such as from primary
care to the acute sector and back again (Russell
et al 2013). There is a convincing case for
investing time and resources in improving
communication and teamwork in health care
to improve patient safety.
Complete time out activity 2
Teamwork behaviours
Teams are composed of individuals with
different knowledge, skills and attributes,
who all contribute particular characteristics
to team performance. However, for a team
to perform successfully, individuals must
share an understanding of what is required to
achieve the desired goal (Endsley 2012). This
means team members must work individually
to carry out their duties while maintaining
an awareness of the need for the collective
contribution of team members (Gluyas and
Morrison 2013). The skills that contribute to
successful teamwork include team leadership,
mutual support, situation monitoring and
effective communication (Baker et al 2012).
Table 1 indicates the knowledge and
behaviours that are required to demonstrate
these skills.
Communication
Communication is necessary in each of the
skills team members require to contribute
to an effective team (Table 1) and may be
considered as the basis for effective teamwork.
It may involve spoken communication,
non-verbal (gestures, facial expression)
and/or written language. It involves one
person initiating a message, along with
receipt of this message by another person or
persons (St Pierre et al 2011). However, the
powerful effect of cognitive processes on the
communication process should be understood
and recognised, since this is central to
promoting effective communication. A human
factors perspective provides a framework for
understanding these effects and considers the
1 Before completing
this article, recall a
time when you were
part of a team that did
not work well together.
Write down the factors
and behaviours that
may have contributed
to this. Once you have
completed the article
and reviewed Table 1,
add any factors you
may have omitted from
this list.
2 Read the case study
in Box 1. Draw a diagram
indicating the different
teams that may have
been involved in Mary’s
care in the community
and in hospital. Identify
specific points where
effective teamwork and
communication were
required between team
members and teams.
NURSING
STANDARD
:: voluses
29 no
49 ::permission.
2015 51
Downloaded
from RCNi.com by ${individualUser.displayName} on Jun 01, 2017. For personal useaugust
only. No5other
without
Copyright © 2017 RCN Publishing Company Ltd
CPD communication
effect of systems, environments, equipment
and processes on human cognitive abilities
and limitations (Catchpole 2013).
Human cognition is a dynamic process
that allows people to perceive, interpret
and make decisions about required actions
(Gluyas and Morrison 2013). The cognitive
load is relatively low when undertaking
well-known tasks in familiar situations. In such
instances, humans are able to carry out tasks
in a somewhat automatic manner with little
conscious thought. However, in unfamiliar or
complex situations, humans must use increased
conscious attention to process what is going
TABLE 1
Teamwork skills and required behaviours
Skill
Required behaviours
Leadership
Communicate awareness and understanding of the
desired outcome.
Communicate understanding of purpose, team
roles, responsibilities, task requirements and plan.
Plan and allocate tasks.
Mutual support
Provide feedback to other team members when
required.
Provide and request assistance when required.
Trust in other team members and have confidence
in their actions and intentions.
Situation monitoring
Review ongoing team performance.
Adjust, adapt and reallocate tasks and
responsibilities as required.
Communication
Share information with other team members.
Communicate clearly using objective language,
correct terminology and structured processes or
tools, where available.
Acknowledge communication and check for correct
interpretation (closed loop communication).
(Miller et al 2009, Baker et al 2012, Gluyas and Morrison 2013)
BOX 1
Case study 1: Mary
Mary presented to the GP feeling unwell, with pain in her right leg of several
days’ duration. On examination the GP identified that Mary had tenderness
and swelling in her right calf; she denied any falls or other incidents that may
have caused this. Since Mary had recently taken a flight overseas, the GP
suspected a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The GP ordered an ultrasound scan
and blood test, which were positive for DVT, and Mary was commenced on
oral anticoagulation therapy. Later that day, she presented to the emergency
department with acute shortness of breath and was admitted with a diagnosis
of pulmonary embolus. She was commenced on parenteral anticoagulation
and respiratory support. After several days, Mary improved and was
discharged into the care of the GP for monitoring of ongoing anticoagulation
therapy, and the community nursing service, which would provide home visits
and support during the recovery phase.
on around them and what actions are required.
Cognitive overload may occur if the situation
is complex, for example where constantly
changing circumstances require intense cognitive
attention to process what is happening (Endsley
2012). Several cognitive processing failures may
then arise, including attentional tunnelling,
confirmation bias, memory failures (slips and
lapses) and inaccurate mental models (Endsley
2012) (Table 2). These limitations in cognitive
processing may be precipitated or exacerbated
by workload pressures, time pressures, stress,
anxiety, fatigue, poor team relationships,
constant interruptions and changing situational
requirements (St Pierre et al 2011).
The cognitive load of the individuals involved
in the communication may affect their processing
of the information. Communication failures
may occur if an individual is in a situation where
there is cognitive overload, for example because
of the volume of data they are trying to process.
Transmission failures may arise from incomplete,
incorrect, ambiguous or unclear messages,
while reception failures may arise because the
message is misinterpreted, disregarded or not
processed and retained in memory (Endsley
2012). Therefore, it is important to recognise the
context of communication and the individual
stresses that might affect the communication
process. The communication process itself is
only one aspect of effective communication;
there are additional barriers that may lead to
communication failures.
Barriers to effective communication
General factors that can increase the likelihood
of communication failures in any setting
include differences in gender, culture, ethnicity,
education and styles of communication.
Also, there are contextual and cultural issues
specific to healthcare settings that may affect
communication in healthcare teams.
One major difference between health care
and many other environments is the existence
of a hierarchical system, both among different
health professional groups and among senior
and junior staff in the same professional group
(Nugus et al 2010). This hierarchy results in
an authority gradient; those further down the
hierarchy may be hesitant to challenge those
further up the hierarchy, raise concerns or ask
questions. In a situation where one member
of the team feels there may be a patient safety
issue, or has concerns of some kind, they may
not feel comfortable raising this or discussing their
concerns with the team (Makary et al 2006,
Reid and Bromiley 2012).
52 august
5 :: volfrom
29 RCNi.com
no 49 :: 2015
STANDARD
Downloaded
by ${individualUser.displayName} on Jun 01, 2017. For personal use only. NoNURSING
other uses without
permission.
Copyright © 2017 RCN Publishing Company Ltd
An example that illustrates this authority
gradient is provided in Reynard et al (2009).
A child experienced facial burns from a dry
swab that caught fire from the diathermy
machine during maxillofacial surgery. The
surgeon immediately changed his practice
to using wet swabs, but ascertained from
colleagues that they previously changed to this
practice because the risk of using dry swabs
had already been identified. When the surgeon
asked nursing staff why they did not inform
him of this practice, they indicated that he had
discouraged suggestions in the past, so they did
not feel comfortable raising issues about his
surgical practice (Reynard et al 2009).
Other studies confirm that reluctance to
speak up about possible patient risk is an
important factor in communication errors
(Leonard et al 2004, Makary et al 2006,
Mackintosh and Sandall 2010, Carayon 2012,
Lyndon et al 2012, Okuyama et al 2014).
Lyndon et al (2012) reported that 12% of
staff were unlikely to speak up even when
there was high risk; this reluctance was related
to previous rudeness or intimidation from
other staff. Other factors that contribute to
this hesitancy include poor leadership and
relationships in the healthcare team, fear
of the responses of others, and concerns
about appearing incompetent in ambiguous
or complex clinical situations (Okuyama
et al 2014).
Differing communication styles between
doctors and nurses may exacerbate authority
gradients that exist in health care. Doctors are
educated on a scientific basis that emphasises
cure and treatment in the management of
patient care. This results in a communication
style that tends to be succinct, with a focus on
scientific facts. Nurse education is informed
by science but has a holistic focus on caring
linked to treatment and management. Nurses’
communication style differs from that of
doctors in that it tends to be more narrative,
rather than concisely factual (Wachter 2012).
Communication between different professional
groups can lead to misunderstanding and
misinterpretation of the message being
communicated, because different professional
staff have expectations of others that are
not explicitly communicated (Donohue and
Endacott 2010).
Implicit expectations, or those not
explicitly communicated, may also be
described as a ‘hint and hope’ dialogue.
This can result in the sender and receiver
failing to communicate, with the sender
hinting at what is required and the receiver
completely missing their message. One
example of this is the case of Elaine Bromiley,
a patient who died following a failed
intubation for a surgical procedure (Reid
and Bromiley 2012, Bromiley 2014). During
the emergency situation, the medical staff
involved were focused on continuing to try to
intubate; the patient became severely hypoxic,
resulting in her death 13 days later (Walker
2008). The authority gradient discouraged
any direct assertion by the nurses that the
situation was an emergency. When a nurse
brought in the tracheostomy tray (without
being asked) and stated that it was ready, the
implicit message was: ‘I have brought in the
tracheostomy tray because you need to look
at alternative airway access for oxygenation.’
This was not the message received by the
medical staff, who remained focused on the
task of intubating the patient and ignored
the interruption (an example of attentional
tunnelling, Table 2). A second nurse was
also ignored when she stated that she had
contacted the intensive care unit (ICU) for
a bed. The implied message was: ‘I have
contacted ICU because this is an emergency
and I am worried about the patient’s
deteriorating observations.’ However, the
nurse’s comments were not interpreted
in this way. The communication failures
were a result of differing communication
styles, as well as the authority gradient and
the cognitive overload of the medical staff
attempting to manage the situation.
TABLE 2
Cognitive processes to manage challenging situations
Cognitive process
Description
Attentional tunnelling
Focusing cognitive attention on one aspect of a
situation that is proving challenging in terms of
understanding or task completion, while ignoring
other information from the environment or context.
Confirmation bias
A tendency to consider only confirming evidence
and to disregard evidence that does not confirm.
Memory failures
(slips and lapses)
Memory failures are associated with automatic
behaviour, where we intend to do something but
our attention is focused elsewhere. We either
forget to carry out an action (lapse), or undertake
steps of an action in the wrong order or leave out
a step entirely (slip).
Inaccurate mental
models
Erroneous mental models of events and what
decisions or actions are required, resulting from
flawed perception or comprehension of a situation.
(Adapted from Endsley 2012)
NURSING
STANDARD
:: voluses
29 no
49 :: permission.
2015 53
Downloaded
from RCNi.com by ${individualUser.displayName} on Jun 01, 2017. For personal useaugust
only. No5 other
without
Copyright © 2017 RCN Publishing Company Ltd
CPD communication
In health care, teams are often not fixed
or established, but have come together for
a specific purpose. They have not had time
to establish roles and responsibilities or to
articulate clearly the apparent objectives of the
team (Wachter 2012). This can lead to different
perceptions or mental models of the situation
and the required outcomes. Shift work, long
hours leading to fatigue, and other common
factors in health care, such as distractions,
interruptions, workload and time pressures,
add to these different perceptions. Therefore,
it is not surprising that poor communication
within teams contributes to errors and poor
patient outcomes. It is imperative to develop
strategies that decrease the likelihood of
communication failures arising from authority
gradients, from differing …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Are you having trouble with the above assignment or one similar?

To date, 239 students have ordered this same assignment from us and received 100% original work. We can do the same for you!

We offers 100% original papers that are written from scratch.We also have a team of editors who check each paper for plagiarism before it is sent to you.

Click this “order now” button to see free Cost Breakdown!